Feed on Posts or Comments 29 January 2023

Environment newlight on 21 Dec 2009 03:17 pm

Don’t blame it on China

After the chaos of Copenhagen climate change summit, UK’s climate change minister Ed Miliband, proud of his ‘last minute rescue’ of the summit, launched an attack on China, suggesting it’s China’s refusal of giving way that caused the summit’s near collapse. It may seems out of frustration, but blaming China for the failure of Copenhagen is not only unfair, but also missing the point.

What the Copenhagen shows us is that this kind of summit doesn’t work when facing such a complicated and pressing issue. Many were over-optimistic before the summit, hyped by Miliband himself, to expect the countries would smooth over their huge difference and work out a treaty with binding targets that will affect all involved. The summit now looks ill prepared, badly organised, without a solid foundation and well communicated understanding. Trying to knock out a deal while all the participants having their own interests to protect, was not realistic.

All major players came to Copenhagen with their own baggage. China, along with India, Brazil and Russia, doesn’t want the binding carbon emission cutting targets to straightjacket its economic growth. Developing countries like China and African countries rightly feel the injustice of taking the burden of emission cut while the industrialized countries who had burned a large amount of fossil fuels now washed their hands by passing the manufactory to developing countries.

The fatal flaw is that the world leaders failed to bring their people with them. There is no real public pressure for the leaders to do something racial now. President Obama arrived Copenhagen empty handed, and then diverted to attack China for not agreeing an international inspection system. (Do we really like WMD style inspectors jetting around the world searching for secret carbon emission?) He went back to the States somehow claiming victory over China. Yes we know his hands are tied, with a resisting domestic opposition to pacify. But that just illustrates how unhelpful and hollow that Ed Miliband decided to single out China.

It’s sad that after all the efforts of scientists and environmental campaigners, the world population are largely not convinced that they have to do something themselves. But all is not lost. The bright side is that the political will does not seem to diminish despite all the disappointment. I believe China is committed to cut carbon emission because for China there is an opportunity to catch up or even lead the green technologies and low carbon industry, and the leadership sees that.

Post-Copenhagen, people are desperate to find a way forward. But playing the blame game isn’t the way.

6 Responses to “Don’t blame it on China”

  1. on 22 Dec 2009 at 01:55 1.jingyehu said …


  2. on 10 Jul 2013 at 06:00 2.blog traffic free said …

    Hi there, You’ve done an incredible job. I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am confident they’ll be benefited from this web site.

  3. on 16 Apr 2015 at 17:42 3.kindness said …

    Great post. I used to be checking constantly this blog and I
    am impressed! Very helpful info particularly the ultimate section :
    ) I maintain such information much. I used to be looking for this particular info for a long time.
    Thanks and good luck.

  4. on 22 Jan 2023 at 03:00 4.InessaSiel said …

    coursework in english
    buy coursework online
    coursework resources

  5. on 27 Jan 2023 at 23:50 5.rhypsurse said …

    Kidney samples of whole left kidney WKH, cortex CTXH, outer medulla OMH, and or inner medulla IMH from the right kidney were immunoblotted for NHE3, NaPi 2, NCC, NKCC2, and the three subunits of ENaC, according to previously defined protocols 10, using our own rabbit polyclonal antibodies against sequences previously described 17, 18, 23 generic priligy

  6. on 28 Jan 2023 at 10:21 6.rhypsurse said …

    Multiple data from the same institution were excluded, except for three datasets, GSE9195, GSE20711 and GSE16391, from Princess Margaret Research, Canada over the counter clomid substitute

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply